23.3.05

When a ten-year series is not enough

I know Singaporean students take the examinations seriously, but this is ridiculous.

Seen in a classroom today:
  • Chemistry examinations at A Level, 1983-2001
  • Mathematics examinations at A Level, 1982-2003
  • Biology examinations at A Level, 1993-2003

Notice that only the last one fulfils the dictionary definition of the "ten-year series" of examination papers. (The "ten-year series" is a phrase used in local parlance to denote assessment books collating Cambridge examinations from previous years. Students use the ten-year series as practice exams for the real thing.) Two of these books are, in fact, twenty-year series --- which means that the seventeen-/eighteen-year-old students who use these books are doing practice exams that were set before they were even born.

Oy vey.

4 Comments:

At 3/23/2005 7:28 pm , Blogger Agagooga said...

"Biology examinations at A Level, 1993-2003"

That's 11 years, my dear.

What's it with girls and maths? :)

 
At 3/23/2005 10:40 pm , Blogger Tym said...

Eh, don't suan girls on my blog. I can too count. I just figured 1993-2003 was close enough to a ten-year series to pass without comment. It was the other two titles that made me do a double-take.

 
At 3/26/2005 4:16 am , Anonymous Andrew said...

In a recent Secondary 2 GEP common test, we had a 1900's question that came out. Needless to say, we had never expected that.

 
At 3/27/2005 11:26 pm , Anonymous voctir said...

I've noticed that for a long time already in 1999 when I was mugging for A's.
All my 'ten-year series' already had questions from the 70's back then.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

 
-->